Skip to content

Aldric Toyad

Content Consultant | Law Student

Menu
  • About Aldric T. Toyad
  • Consulting Services
  • Cookie Policy
  • Copy & Content Writing
  • Copyright, Disclaimer, and Site Policy
  • Courses, Training, & Workshops
  • Résumé
Menu

Holland v Hodgson (1872) LR 7 CP 328, 41 LJCP 146, 20 WR 990 [1861-73] All ER Rep 237

Posted on September 20, 2021

Holland v Hodgson is 130 years old. Yet, it is still applied today!

It was applied as recently as 11 August 2021 by the Queen’s Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court) in the case of The Royal Parks Ltd and others v Bluebird Boats Ltd [2021] EWHC 2278 (TCC).

Here in Malaysia, it is still valid law.

The High Court in Malaya referred to it in Sri Ternak Mart (Sk) Sdn Bhd v Majlis Perbandaran Subang Jaya [2019] MLJU 1635. If you can recall, Holland v Hodgson found its way (among others) into the case of the Shell Company of the Federation of Malaya v Commissioner of the Federal Capital of Kuala Lumpur [1964] 1 MLJ 302 (Here is the link to my previous entry).

Based on a quick survey on Lexis advance, the case was recently referred to in:

  • Australia: Patterson v Craft Decor Pty Ltd (ACN 008 759 206) | [2021] WASAT 89
  • Canada: G.R.J. Holdings Ltd. v. Total Energy Services Ltd. [2017] A.J. No. 1283
  • Hong Kong: Mohinisons Co Ltd v Koonex Technology Ltd [2019] HKCU 3802
  • New Zealand: Keller v Daisley [2021] NZCA 351
  • Singapore: HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) Ltd (Trustee of Capitaland Mall Trust) v Chief Assessor [2019] SGHC 95 — [2020] 3 SLR 510

Let’s dive into this influential case.

Holland v Hodgson: Quick Overview

Blackburn J delivered the judgement of the Court of Exchequer Chamber on 23 May 1872.

The judges on the Bench were:

  • Kelly CB (i.e., Sir Fitzroy Edward Kelly, Lord Chief Baron of the Exchequer)
  • Blackburn J – Sir Colin Blackburn, later The Rt. Hon. The Lord Blackburn
  • Mellor J – Likely Sir John Mellor
  • Hannen J – James Hannen (Later The Rt. Hon. The Lord Hannen)
  • Channell B – Sir William Channell, Baron of the Exchequer
  • Cleasby B – Sir Anthony Cleasby, Baron of the Exchequer

This case is an appeal by the defendants from the Court of Common Pleas which ruled in favour of the plaintiffs/claimants:

  • Appellant/Defendant – Holland & Another
  • Respondent/Plaintiff – Hodgson & Another

Facts of the Case

George Mason owned a mill. He later mortgaged the mill and its fixtures to the Plaintiffs through a mortgage dated 7 April 1869. Unfortunately, the mortgage deed was not registered under the Bills of Sale Act 1854.

Through deed dated 3 July 1869, Mason assigned all his estate and effects to the Defendants. The defendants acted as trustees to Mason’s creditors. This July Deed was registered under the Bankruptcy Act 1861. After it took effect, the Defendants took possession of all of Mason’s properties including looms and engines belonging to the Plaintiff. These were all sold.

The Court of Common Pleas gave judgement for the Plaintiff except for the shuttles and engines.

Judgement Delivered by Blackburn J

I. Trade and Tenant Fixtures

The unregistered April deed was void when the Defendants took possession of the properties and personal chattels on behalf of Mason’s creditors.

The Court of Exchequer Chambers also turned to its decision in Climie v Wood where it ruled that trade or tenant fixtures form part o the land. Fixtures pass by the land’s conveyance.

However, a tenant has the right to sever the fixtures from the land.

Mortgagors, on the other hand, do not have similar rights.

“Things which are annexed to the land for the purpose, of trade or of domestic convenience or ornament in so permanent a manner as to become part of the land, and yet the tenant who has erected them is entitled to remove them during his term, or it may be within a reasonable time after its expiration.”

Defining trade and tenant fixtures in Climie v Wood

II. Attachment to the Land

The legal maxim “what is annexed to the land becomes part of the land” remains true. However, the court needs to decide on to precise when an annexation becomes part of the land.

Blackburn J reasoned that this is examined on a case-by-case basis. The learned judge put forward two conditions to guide the court:

a) Degree of Annexation

An object attached to the land only by its weight is a chattel (Wiltshear v Cottrell).

b) Object /Purpose of Annexation

When a chattel is intended to be part of the land, even if it wasn’t attached to it, then the chattel becomes part of the land (D’Eyncourt v Gregory).

Blackburn’s Illustrations

Blackburn employed blocks of stone stacked one on top of the other as an example. As a drystone wall without cement or mortar, it still’s part of the land. Conversely, blocks of stone stacked isn’t part of the land when it’s just there for storage.

In another example, large ships anchored to the riverbed or seabed isn’t a fixture of the land. Yet, the anchor must be fixed to the ground to bear the strain of the cable. Cables fixed to a riverbed to hold a suspension bridge in place, however, becomes part of the land.

2 thoughts on “Holland v Hodgson (1872) LR 7 CP 328, 41 LJCP 146, 20 WR 990 [1861-73] All ER Rep 237”

  1. Pingback: Material Trading Pte Ltd v DBS Finance Ltd [1988] 2 MLJ 162
  2. Pingback: Kiah binte Hanapiah v Som binte Hanapiah [1953] 1 MLJ 82

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Home
  • About Aldric T. Toyad
    • Copy & Content Writing
    • Consulting Services
    • Courses, Training, & Workshops
    • Portfolio
    • Résumé
  • Content Writing for Legal Topics/Law Firms
  • Blog Categories
    • Book Review
    • Business Jargons
    • Case Studies
    • Podcast Review
    • Reading Law: Revived
      • Administrative Law
      • Case Summary, Notes, & Analysis
      • Constitutional Law
      • Law of Torts
      • Land Law
      • Malaysian Legal System
    • Weekly Review
    • Thoughts on Paper
    • Monthly Digital Assets Report
  • Copyright, Disclaimer, and Site Policy

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Archives

Recent Posts

  • April 2005: Elements of Hart’s Primary and Secondary Rules
  • April 2005: Kelsen’s Idea of the Grundnorm
  • April 2005: Austin’s Improper Law
  • Can a Special Session of Parliament be called to Elect a Prime Minister?
  • April 2005: Savigny’s Volksgeist

Recent Comments

  • Can a Special Session of Parliament be called to Elect a Prime Minister? on Making Sense of Judicial Decisions
  • Malvin on Subsidiary Legislation in Malaysia: A Brief Introduction
  • Delegatus Non Potest Delegare and its rules in sub-delegation of powers. on Can a Minister’s aide Convey a Notice of Rejection?
  • Kiah binte Hanapiah v Som binte Hanapiah [1953] 1 MLJ 82 on Holland v Hodgson (1872) LR 7 CP 328, 41 LJCP 146, 20 WR 990 [1861-73] All ER Rep 237
  • Socfin Co Ltd v Chairman Klang Town Council [1964] 1 MLJ 325 on The Shell Company of the Federation of Malaya v President, Town Council Bandar Penggaram, Batu Pahat [1962] 1 MLJ 277
Aldric Toyad > Reading Law: Revived > Case Summary, Notes, & Analysis > Holland v Hodgson (1872) LR 7 CP 328, 41 LJCP 146, 20 WR 990 [1861-73] All ER Rep 237

Not Legal or Professional Advice

While I attempt to ensure the content is written as accurately and precisely as possible, know that it does not constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. Neither my website nor I will be held accountable for the consequences following your action based on the content herein. If you need specific advice (e.g., medical, legal, financial or risk management), please seek a professional who is licensed or knowledgeable in the area.

©2023 Aldric Toyad | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorised as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyse and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up