Category: Reading Law: Revived
In February 2008, I started https://readinglaw.wordpress.com to document my thoughts and journey as a then student enrolled in UiTM’s Bachelor of Legal Studies (Hons.). Alas, my journey ended abruptly around Q3 2008. Yet my interest in law has not subsided. The basic skills learnt in Uni continued to guide me. ‘Reading Law: Revived’ serves as a collection of my readings and learning of this field I continue to hold interest in. Who knows where this journey would bring me to.
This was the second question for our recent Administrative Law test. The first part can be accessed here. Similar to…
This was my answer to the Individual Test for our Administrative Law. Based on the evaluation by the lecturer, I…
Kiah binte Hanapiah v Som binte Hanapiah is a saga between siblings over the inheritance of their grandfather’s house. Unlike…
Socfin Co Ltd v Chairman, Klang Town Council comes a few months after the High Court’s decision in Shell Company…
Material Trading Pte Ltd v DBS Finance Ltd is an application by the plaintiffs to the High Court of Singapore…
The Federal Court delivered its judgement for Loh Kooi Choon v Government of Malaysia [1977] 2 MLJ 187 on June…
Holland v Hodgson is 130 years old. Yet, it is still applied today! It was applied as recently as 11…
This is an appeal against the Rating Assessment conducted by the local government. The parties are: Appellant: Shell Company of…
The High Court heard an appeal by way of originating motion. The parties are: Appellant: Shell Company of the Federation…
The High Court in Sabah & Sarawak heard this appeal. The Hon. Justice Ian Chin (as he was then) delivered…
