Note: This April 2022 reflection was first published on my personal Facebook profile on 5 May 2022. Looking back at #April2022, I am glad to share some professional accomplishments: 1. MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION…
Delegatus Non Potest Delegare and its rules in sub-delegation of powers.
This was the second question for our recent Administrative Law test. The first part can be accessed here. Similar to the previous question, I received an eight out of 10 marks. The…
Can a Minister’s aide Convey a Notice of Rejection?
This was my answer to the Individual Test for our Administrative Law. Based on the evaluation by the lecturer, I received 8 out of 10 marks. The answer script was copied and…
What do you do for a living?
I noticed a surge of new LinkedIn visitors. So in this post, I wanna share what I do currently. One frequently asked question is, “What do you do for a living?”
Why Would Someone Do Something for Free?
Long before I dabbled into the world of #PublicRelations and #MediaRelations, I often wondered: “Why are people helping me out?” “Because you deserve it” is not a satisfactory answer. That answer just…
Kiah binte Hanapiah v Som binte Hanapiah [1953] 1 MLJ 82
Kiah binte Hanapiah v Som binte Hanapiah is a saga between siblings over the inheritance of their grandfather’s house. Unlike many traditional Malay houses, the design of the house in question was…
Socfin Co Ltd v Chairman Klang Town Council [1964] 1 MLJ 325
Socfin Co Ltd v Chairman, Klang Town Council comes a few months after the High Court’s decision in Shell Company of the Federation Malaya Ltd v Commissioner of the Federal Capital of…
Material Trading Pte Ltd v DBS Finance Ltd [1988] 2 MLJ 162
Material Trading Pte Ltd v DBS Finance Ltd is an application by the plaintiffs to the High Court of Singapore to declare that overhead cranes were chattels. The parties involved were: Plaintiff:…
Loh Kooi Choon v Government of Malaysia [1977] 2 MLJ 187
The Federal Court delivered its judgement for Loh Kooi Choon v Government of Malaysia [1977] 2 MLJ 187 on June 7th, 1977. Who were the two parties in the suit? Appellant |…
Holland v Hodgson (1872) LR 7 CP 328, 41 LJCP 146, 20 WR 990 [1861-73] All ER Rep 237
Holland v Hodgson is 130 years old. Yet, it is still applied today! It was applied as recently as 11 August 2021 by the Queen’s Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court) in…
